• Recent Posts: Influencer Relations

    Webinar: Survey shows new risks for analyst relations

    Webinar: Survey shows new risks for analyst relations

    A first glance at the Analyst Value Survey shows new risks emerging for analyst relations professionals. We’re hosting a webinar on November 30 to hear how leading AR professionals are responding to them, and what the best practice is for your analyst relations program. Three risks stand out massively. First, there a big gap between the firms that vendors think […]

    Vendors’ five key thoughts about analyst firms

    Vendors’ five key thoughts about analyst firms

    Five things stand out from vendors’ responses to a survey we conducted after our Analyst Relations roundtable at the English Speaking Union. Analysts (including analysts who call themselves consultants or advisors) are often thought to have bias, especially if most of their revenue comes from vendors. Sometimes the effort put into staying informed makes analysts seem very process-driven but less […]

    Join us for the Forum in San José on November 17

    Join us for the Forum in San José on November 17

    Should someone you know be at the year’s most important discussion on analyst relations? We’ll be at the free ARchitect User Forum 2016 in San José, CA, on November 17. Professionals from industry leaders will introduce the sessions: Lopez Research, Digital transformation; IBM, AR in large organizations; Cognizant, Managing analyst events;  Capgemini, AR knowledge management; Wipro, Intelligence-driven relationships; and ARinsights, AR […]

    Take the 2016/17 Analyst Value Survey

    Take the 2016/17 Analyst Value Survey

    The Analyst Value Survey is open! Each year several hundred users of analyst research tell us which analyst firms they use, and which are most valuable. In exchange, they get access to our results webinar, where they discover which firms are delivering the most value in key market segments. You can take part too. Go to AnalystValueSurvey.com and click on […]

    Guess Who’s Looking for Top Talent in Analyst Relations?

    Guess Who’s Looking for Top Talent in Analyst Relations?

    Looking for a new direction in your Analyst Relations career? October is a time when new opportunities pop up in the field. From IBM to Google, we gathered the top US Analyst Relations firms with vacancies needing to be filled. If you’d like to learn more about the opportunity and to schedule an interview, contact these firms directly. However, if […]

Pet peeve – reporters who refer to analyst firms as consultancies

icon-the-press-110w.jpgI guess I am just a nit picker, but it always catches my eye when reporters refer to Gartner, Forrester, et cetera as consultants or consultancies. The analysts’ business and research models are typically quite different from consultants. Best to refer to analyst firms as “research and advisory firm” or “market researcher.”

Also catching my eye is when a reporter refers to Gartner, Inc. as Gartner Group. Geez, it changed its name back in January 2001, get with the program.

3 Responses

  1. This is more of a habit with some outlets than others — most use appropriate terms IMHO. That being said, some of the firms are all of the above – researchers, advisors and consultants.

    The Webster’s definition of a “consultant” is: a person who gives professional or expert advice: (example) a consultant on business methods.

    This certainly is a function — to a degree — of many firms, or specific analysts at those firms.

    One pet peeve I have is when reporters don’t use correct titles — for example, you often see in print “… said Martin Reynolds, an analyst at Gartner…” or “According to Rob Enderle, an analyst with Enderle Group…” etc.

    WRT use of the term “Gartner Group” instead of “Gartner, Inc.” or just plain “Gartner” … some habits die hard.

    –Gerry

  2. If you consider Robin Bloor’s recent post on “What Do Analysts Do?” (http://havemacwillblog.com/2008/02/04/how-to-deal-with-analysts-4-what-do-analysts-do/), there’s quite a bit of overlap between what would fall under a consultant label versus an analyst label. I’ve done many of the activities on that list while wearing a consultant’s hat, but as my activities broaden, I find myself self-identifying more as an analyst. Many independents like myself, or small firms, have a foot in both camps, so the particular title applied can be a bit subjective.

  3. Hi Gerry and Sandy,

    Thanks for the comments. Like I said a pet peeve. ;->

    However, both your comments illustrate how titles are not clear cut as they use to be… if they ever were.

    In the context of this particular post, I’m referring to those individuals, typically at major firms, with the general job description of “analyst.”

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: