• Recent Posts: Influencer Relations

    Netscout continues unwise Gartner suit

    Netscout continues unwise Gartner suit

    Netscout and Gartner have scheduled their trial for next July. The case stands little chance of improving Netscout’s value. It does, however, risk harming the reputation of both analyst firms and analyst relations professionals. Over the last weeks, pressure has mounted on Netscout’s lawyers. Netscout claims Gartner’s Magic Quadrant harmed its enterprise sales and that the truth of Gartner’s statements […]

    Is this how the Quadrant lost its Magic?

    Is this how the Quadrant lost its Magic?

    Gartner’s Magic Quadrant is the most influential non-financial business research document. In the late 1980s, it was a quick and dirty stalking horse to provoke discussions. Today it is an extensive and yet highly limited process, based on the quantification of opinions which are highly qualitative. The early evolution of the MQ tells us a lot about the challenge of industry […]

    Saying farewell to David Bradshaw

    Saying farewell to David Bradshaw

    A funeral and celebration for David Bradshaw (shown left in this 2000 Ovum awayday photo, arm raised, with me and other colleagues) is to take place at West Norwood Crematorium, London SE27 at 2.45pm on Tuesday 23rd August and after at the Amba Hotel above London’s Charing Cross Station, on the Strand. David considered that that Ovum in that incarnation was […]

    David Bradshaw 1953-2016

    David Bradshaw 1953-2016

    David Bradshaw, one of the colleagues I worked with during my time as an analyst at Ovum, died on August 11. He led Cloud research in Europe for IDC, whose statement is below. David played a unique role at Ovum, bridging its telecoms and IT groups in the late 1990s by looking at computer-telecoms integration areas like CRM, which I […]

    AR managers are failing with consulting firms

    AR managers are failing with consulting firms

    Reflecting the paradoxical position of many clients, Kea’s Analyst Attitude Survey also goes to a wide range of consultants who play similar roles to analysts and are often employed by analyst firms. The responses to the current survey show that consultants are generally much less happy with their relationships with AR teams than analysts are. The paradox is that as […]

Pet peeve – reporters who refer to analyst firms as consultancies

icon-the-press-110w.jpgI guess I am just a nit picker, but it always catches my eye when reporters refer to Gartner, Forrester, et cetera as consultants or consultancies. The analysts’ business and research models are typically quite different from consultants. Best to refer to analyst firms as “research and advisory firm” or “market researcher.”

Also catching my eye is when a reporter refers to Gartner, Inc. as Gartner Group. Geez, it changed its name back in January 2001, get with the program.

3 Responses

  1. This is more of a habit with some outlets than others — most use appropriate terms IMHO. That being said, some of the firms are all of the above – researchers, advisors and consultants.

    The Webster’s definition of a “consultant” is: a person who gives professional or expert advice: (example) a consultant on business methods.

    This certainly is a function — to a degree — of many firms, or specific analysts at those firms.

    One pet peeve I have is when reporters don’t use correct titles — for example, you often see in print “… said Martin Reynolds, an analyst at Gartner…” or “According to Rob Enderle, an analyst with Enderle Group…” etc.

    WRT use of the term “Gartner Group” instead of “Gartner, Inc.” or just plain “Gartner” … some habits die hard.

    –Gerry

  2. If you consider Robin Bloor’s recent post on “What Do Analysts Do?” (http://havemacwillblog.com/2008/02/04/how-to-deal-with-analysts-4-what-do-analysts-do/), there’s quite a bit of overlap between what would fall under a consultant label versus an analyst label. I’ve done many of the activities on that list while wearing a consultant’s hat, but as my activities broaden, I find myself self-identifying more as an analyst. Many independents like myself, or small firms, have a foot in both camps, so the particular title applied can be a bit subjective.

  3. Hi Gerry and Sandy,

    Thanks for the comments. Like I said a pet peeve. ;->

    However, both your comments illustrate how titles are not clear cut as they use to be… if they ever were.

    In the context of this particular post, I’m referring to those individuals, typically at major firms, with the general job description of “analyst.”

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: