• Recent Posts: Influencer Relations

    Take the 2016/17 Analyst Value Survey

    Take the 2016/17 Analyst Value Survey

    The Analyst Value Survey is open! Each year several hundred users of analyst research tell us which analyst firms they use, and which are most valuable. In exchange, they get access to our results webinar, where they discover which firms are delivering the most value in key market segments. You can take part too. Go to AnalystValueSurvey.com and click on […]

    Guess Who’s Looking for Top Talent in Analyst Relations?

    Guess Who’s Looking for Top Talent in Analyst Relations?

    Looking for a new direction in your Analyst Relations career? October is a time when new opportunities pop up in the field. From IBM to Google, we gathered the top US Analyst Relations firms with vacancies needing to be filled. If you’d like to learn more about the opportunity and to schedule an interview, contact these firms directly. However, if […]

    Why KCG’s analyst relations awards beat the IIAR’s

    Why KCG’s analyst relations awards beat the IIAR’s

    We used 18,777 data points from the Analyst Attitude Survey to compare the two leading awards for analyst relations teams. Although we found that KCG‘s awards are more useful than the IIAR‘s, both primarily reflect corporate performance rather than that of the AR teams. As a result, there’s very little that AR teams can do better or worse in these […]

    Netscout continues unwise Gartner suit

    Netscout continues unwise Gartner suit

    Netscout and Gartner have scheduled their trial for next July. The case stands little chance of improving Netscout’s value. It does, however, risk harming the reputation of both analyst firms and analyst relations professionals. Over the last weeks, pressure has mounted on Netscout’s lawyers. Netscout claims Gartner’s Magic Quadrant harmed its enterprise sales and that the truth of Gartner’s statements […]

    Is this how the Quadrant lost its Magic?

    Is this how the Quadrant lost its Magic?

    Gartner’s Magic Quadrant is the most influential non-financial business research document. In the late 1980s, it was a quick and dirty stalking horse to provoke discussions. Today it is an extensive and yet highly limited process, based on the quantification of opinions which are highly qualitative. The early evolution of the MQ tells us a lot about the challenge of industry […]

Forrester acquires JupiterResearch – will the analysts stay or walk?

logo-forrester.gifForrester Research acquired JupiterResearch for $23 million in cash plus assumed liabilities. JupiterResearch joins Forrester’s Marketing & Strategy Client Group. Click here to read the press release and click here to read a blog post by analyst Josh Bernoff.

The key question for any analyst firm merger & acquisition (M&A) activity is whether the acquired analysts – the core intellectual property value – stay with their new employer or leave. For example, in the case of Gartner’s acquisition of META more than 50% of the analysts left voluntarily or through buyouts within a few months.

Our initial impression is that the JupiterResearch acquisition is more of an expansion of Forrester’s services than a consolidation move to eliminate a competitor. This is similar to Forrester’s Giga acquisition, but different from Gartner’s grab of META which was clearly a strategic move to keep META out of Yankee Group and kill a competitor. Regardless of motivation, it is still possible that Forrester will lose many of the analysts unless they execute the integration correctly.

In addition to what happens to JupiterResearch analysts, this M&A event could also impact Forrester analysts as coverage assignments might be changed. Regardless of changes in coverage or even departures of Forrester analysts, there is a high probability that analysts in the Marketing & Strategy Client Group will find their productivity negatively impacted during the transition period.

For JupiterResearch prospects and clients currently negotiating contracts or renewals it makes sense not to execute on any new contracts. If you are an existing Forrester client, you should focus on whether or not you will need to expand your Forrester contract as access to the acquired Jupiter published research and analysts might be included in the current RoleView offering. For prospects and clients of Jupiter who are not Forrester clients, the situation is much more complex as you have to weigh the potential value of a Forrester contract if the Jupiter analysts you are interested in decide to leave the merged firm.

For analyst relations (AR) professionals, this M&A event impacts your analyst lists and outreach plans. Carefully monitor changes to analyst status (employment and research) coverage of both Jupiter and Forrester analysts and adjust your plans accordingly.

There are a number of relevant Forrester and Jupiter analysts that Twitter on a regular basis (see Analyst Twitter Directory). Because of the off-the-cuff nature of tweeting, monitoring the analysts’ tweets will provide an indication of the analyst morale and other transition issues.

SageCircle Advisory clients are encouraged to schedule an inquiry to discuss what this event means to them. Contact us at 650-274-8309 or inquiry [at] sagecircle dot com.

Bottom Line: While this M&A does not appear to be focused on killing a competitor, this does not mean that ongoing access to JupiterResearch’s analysts is guaranteed. Prospects of JupiterResearch need to evaluate the ongoing business value of a new Forrester contract if key analysts leave the combined firm.

Related posts:

Forrester buying Jupiter – smart, but not a big deal

Which acqusitions in the analyst industry were winners or duds?



11 Responses

  1. This should be great for us and our clients. See our post on the topic: http://blogs.forrester.com/groundswell/2008/07/forrester-buys.html

  2. I got the following question via Twitter:

    cselland: @carterlusher where would they walk TO?
    about 7 hours ago · Reply · View Tweet

    Typically when analysts leave a firm post acquisition they do one of the following:

    1. Join another analyst firm
    2. Hang out their own shingle (i.e., start a firm)
    3. Join a vendor

    It is rare when an analyst gets hired by IT at a large enterprise or PR firm.

    Even in this economic environment, some firms are hiring. For instance, in yesterday’s Gartner Q2 earnings call, CEO Gene Hall mentioned that expenses in the 2nd half would go up in part due to hiring some analysts.

  3. How the might have fallen🙂

    a little memorabilia here:


    as Chris points out, there’s a shortage of good analysts out there right now. Am sure Forrester will want to keep most of the analyst talent they have acquired. In addition, they can now push after the internet media space without much competition,


  4. […] this happened (when Giga was acquired) there was initially quite a lot of hope followed by quite a few analyst movements. Time will tell what the outcome of this move will be – however, if we follow George Colony’s […]

  5. Hi Phil, Thanks for the comment.

    Great link [makes me a bit nostalgic]. What was also interesting was the number of acquistions Jupiter had made to grow.

    Trivia questions – who was an early, minority investor in Jupiter Communications? Why Gartner Group! GG made a $8m investment in the startup in Oct 97 to get a 32% stake.

  6. Josh, thanks for the comment.

    Yes, there is great potential for relief for Forrester’s overworked social media analysts. >>grin<<

    Seriously, if Forrester does a decent job on the integration, then it will turn out to be a win-win situation for the firm and its clients.

    However, history shows that successful acquistions in the analyst industry are few and far between.

  7. […] Forrester acquires JupiterResearch – will the analysts stay or walk? […]

  8. […] acqusitions in… on Forrester buying Jupiter – sma…Forrester buying Jup… on Forrester acquires JupiterRese…Forrester buying Jup… on Which acqusitions in the analy…Forrester buying Jup… […]

  9. […] this happened (when Giga was acquired) there was initially quite a lot of hope followed by quite a few analyst movements. Time will tell what the outcome of this move will be – however, if we follow George Colony’s […]

  10. […] purchase, therefore, is not “business at usual”, to take Carter’s phrase. It’s a sign of the time – that recession is making the owners of analyst […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: