• Recent Posts: Influencer Relations

    Why KCG’s analyst relations awards beat the IIAR’s

    Why KCG’s analyst relations awards beat the IIAR’s

    We used 18,777 data points from the Analyst Attitude Survey to compare the two leading awards for analyst relations teams. Although we found that KCG‘s awards are more useful than the IIAR‘s, both primarily reflect corporate performance rather than that of the AR teams. As a result, there’s very little that AR teams can do better or worse in these […]

    Netscout continues unwise Gartner suit

    Netscout continues unwise Gartner suit

    Netscout and Gartner have scheduled their trial for next July. The case stands little chance of improving Netscout’s value. It does, however, risk harming the reputation of both analyst firms and analyst relations professionals. Over the last weeks, pressure has mounted on Netscout’s lawyers. Netscout claims Gartner’s Magic Quadrant harmed its enterprise sales and that the truth of Gartner’s statements […]

    Is this how the Quadrant lost its Magic?

    Is this how the Quadrant lost its Magic?

    Gartner’s Magic Quadrant is the most influential non-financial business research document. In the late 1980s, it was a quick and dirty stalking horse to provoke discussions. Today it is an extensive and yet highly limited process, based on the quantification of opinions which are highly qualitative. The early evolution of the MQ tells us a lot about the challenge of industry […]

    Saying farewell to David Bradshaw

    Saying farewell to David Bradshaw

    A funeral and celebration for David Bradshaw (shown left in this 2000 Ovum awayday photo, arm raised, with me and other colleagues) is to take place at West Norwood Crematorium, London SE27 at 2.45pm on Tuesday 23rd August and after at the Amba Hotel above London’s Charing Cross Station, on the Strand. David considered that that Ovum in that incarnation was […]

    David Bradshaw 1953-2016

    David Bradshaw 1953-2016

    David Bradshaw, one of the colleagues I worked with during my time as an analyst at Ovum, died on August 11. He led Cloud research in Europe for IDC, whose statement is below. David played a unique role at Ovum, bridging its telecoms and IT groups in the late 1990s by looking at computer-telecoms integration areas like CRM, which I […]

Essential AR skill – knowing analyst firm research methodologies

One of the essential skills for all analyst relations (AR) professionals is knowing the different types of research methodologies used by analysts and the implications for vendors. 

For example, advisory analysts* are very well positioned to spot  a vendor’s message inconsistencies. That is because advisory analysts are talking to a wide variety of people that interact with that vendor in addition to the analysts’ direct interactions which are arranged by the vendor (click on graphic to enlarge). Advisory analysts hear from their end-user clients during inquiries what the vendor sales representatives are saying to the end user. The analyst is then in position to compare what the sales rep is saying to prospects/customers versus what AR and executives are directly telling the analyst. Advisory analysts are also talking to financial analysts and the press, which provides additional opportunity to compare what AR is saying to the analyst in contrast to what the vendor is saying to these other communities.

This is a critical insight for AR teams that need to interact with advisory analysts. For these AR pros it is important to get linked into the message creation and management processes in their companies. By inserting themselves into messaging activities, these AR teams can identify potentially troublesome message inconsistencies that could cause problems with advisory analysts.

* Definition: “Advisory analysts” are analysts who’s primarily client base is technology buyers (aka end users, usually IT managers). AMR, Forrester and Gartner are examples of advisory analyst firms though each does have significant vendor client bases as well.

Are you confident that you know the various types of research methodologies employed by analysts? If not, you should consider attending SageCircle’s AR Effectiveness Seminar (brochure, click here to register) or subscribing to the Online SageContentTM Library (click here to learn more and subscribe). Even if you are an experienced AR pro, attending a seminar can help you brush up on your knowledge about the analysts and AR best practices.

SageCircle Technique:

  • Use client inquiry to ask advisory analysts if through their various sources they hear a consistent message from your company’s representatives
  • Obtain standard presentations from other parts of your company (e.g., sales and investor relations) to compare to your presentations
  • Volunteer to participate in messaging exercises

Bottom Line: There are a variety of essential skills for AR professionals. Understanding the analyst research methodologies and how that changes the AR approach is one skill can prevent AR from being embarrassed in front of executives.

Question: AR professionals – Have you experienced a situation where an advisory analyst has pointed out message consistencies to you during a briefing?

2 Responses

  1. Yes Carter, but conversely “Prescribers” analysts -those advising end users- often use that argument against vendors even though they sometimes know it’s fallacious.

    It goes this way: vendor says something, analyst respond “but I am not seeing this with my clients”.

    One has to remember that IT analysts often talk with clients at a lower level than a sales VP at a vendor and also that even Gartner only addresses a fraction of the market. This is especially true in Asia Pac and in continental Europe.

    For confidentiality reasons it’s not possible to cross-examine customers lists but AR pros should provide more references and can possibly sometimes show (not give!) printed customer lists…

  2. Hi Ludovic, Thanks for the comment.

    I completely agree with you that advisory analysts will sometimes fall back on “client confidentiality” and cite “data points” they cannot prove are real. That is why it is so important to peel the onion on their statements and provide lots of customer stories.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: