• Recent Posts: Influencer Relations

    Top ten global analysts: 2016’s outstanding research

    Top ten global analysts: 2016’s outstanding research

    2016 produced some outstanding analyst research. We’ve picked the best articles from each of the world’s ten leading analysts firms, as ranked in the 2017 Analyst Firm Awards. Together they show how diverse analysts’ most compelling content can be, including deep quantitative research into mature markets, like cellphones; pointed competitive insight into corporate changes, like Dell’s integration of EMC, and […]

    IDC overtakes HfS in 2017 global Analyst Firm Awards

    IDC overtakes HfS in 2017 global Analyst Firm Awards

    Gartner and Forrester’s leadership is no surprise, but this year IDC has won back third place in our annual Analyst Firm Awards, pushing HfS Research into a still-impressive fourth place. PAC and Ovum have also risen substantially this year, rounding out the top six. In last year’s awards, we saw that firms that could create business leads for their clients […]

    Analyst Value Survey shows deeper frustration with industry analysts

    Analyst Value Survey shows deeper frustration with industry analysts

    I’ve been in New York this week discussing the Analyst Value Survey with both Kea clients and industry analysts. The 2017 report will be available early in January, but the responses show that many users of analysts’ services are reaching out to more firms than before, and are gathering quite uneven value. Firstly, the good news is that many users […]

    Webinar: Survey shows new risks for analyst relations

    Webinar: Survey shows new risks for analyst relations

    A first glance at the Analyst Value Survey shows new risks emerging for analyst relations professionals. We’re hosting a webinar on November 30 to hear how leading AR professionals are responding to them, and what the best practice is for your analyst relations program. Three risks stand out massively. First, there a big gap between the firms that vendors think […]

    Vendors’ five key thoughts about analyst firms

    Vendors’ five key thoughts about analyst firms

    Five things stand out from vendors’ responses to a survey we conducted after our Analyst Relations roundtable at the English Speaking Union. Analysts (including analysts who call themselves consultants or advisors) are often thought to have bias, especially if most of their revenue comes from vendors. Sometimes the effort put into staying informed makes analysts seem very process-driven but less […]

Never assume during an annual renewal that the analyst service contract remains the same

Annual syndicated research subscriptions are a common approach for enterprises and vendors when it comes to gaining access to published research and advisory. However, for all the value and convenience in this type of contract, there is a potential “gotcha” to watch for during the contract renewal – changes in the terms and conditions.

Often contract renewals follow a simple path of adjusting the number of seats and add-on services based on past year’s usage, new requirements, and new offerings by the firm. Often the analyst firm sales representative will send along the new contract with a note that says “it is basically the same as last year, so please look at pages x and y to make sure we have captured the number of seats and services you need.  Then sign on page z.” If the client does not carefully go through the contract with a fine-tooth comb they might miss that the “basically the same” contract actually has some key changes to the terms and conditions that severely limit their use of the analyst services or gives the analyst firms the right to audit the client for contract compliance. 

In some cases, the firm sales rep does not know that the changes are there, they are simply using the new standard contract. In other cases, the sales rep is aware of the changes but does not want to bring them to the client’s attention for fear of sparking a long review and negotiation process.

SageCircle Technique:

  • Never accept that a contract submitted during a renewal is no different than the prior year’s contract
  • Compare the old and new contracts side-by-side to identify all changes, small and large
  • Carefully consider the wording of the changes as minor word changes can have major implications
  • Never accept that the contract is locked in stone, involve your legal department if necessary

Bottom Line: Analyst services contract managers need to do a zero-based review of all analyst contracts during annual renewals. While the firms are not necessarily doing anything underhanded, it is incumbent on contract managers to ensure that these documents do not give the firms any unfair advantages.

Question: Analyst clients – Do you have examples of changes in Ts & Cs that surprised you? How did you handle your response?

One Response

  1. Three add-ons to this.

    First – build trust through a longer term relationship if you can. Then, your service account manager will review the contract before they offer it to you. They won’t want to damage the relationship through nasty surprises.

    Second – it’s worth involving your in-house procurement professionals to review contracts. Try to identify a colleague who can work with you consistently across the range of contracts, so that they get to know both the marketplace and your internal needs. This pays dividends: after all, you can’t go to the analysts for advice about analyst contracts!

    Third – at least every three years, review and re-state your requirements and do a full RFP with multiple bidders. As Carter knows, InformationSpan have frameworks for this analysis

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: