• Recent Posts: Influencer Relations

    Take the 2016/17 Analyst Value Survey

    Take the 2016/17 Analyst Value Survey

    The Analyst Value Survey is open! Each year several hundred users of analyst research tell us which analyst firms they use, and which are most valuable. In exchange, they get access to our results webinar, where they discover which firms are delivering the most value in key market segments. You can take part too. Go to AnalystValueSurvey.com and click on […]

    Guess Who’s Looking for Top Talent in Analyst Relations?

    Guess Who’s Looking for Top Talent in Analyst Relations?

    Looking for a new direction in your Analyst Relations career? October is a time when new opportunities pop up in the field. From IBM to Google, we gathered the top US Analyst Relations firms with vacancies needing to be filled. If you’d like to learn more about the opportunity and to schedule an interview, contact these firms directly. However, if […]

    Why KCG’s analyst relations awards beat the IIAR’s

    Why KCG’s analyst relations awards beat the IIAR’s

    We used 18,777 data points from the Analyst Attitude Survey to compare the two leading awards for analyst relations teams. Although we found that KCG‘s awards are more useful than the IIAR‘s, both primarily reflect corporate performance rather than that of the AR teams. As a result, there’s very little that AR teams can do better or worse in these […]

    Netscout continues unwise Gartner suit

    Netscout continues unwise Gartner suit

    Netscout and Gartner have scheduled their trial for next July. The case stands little chance of improving Netscout’s value. It does, however, risk harming the reputation of both analyst firms and analyst relations professionals. Over the last weeks, pressure has mounted on Netscout’s lawyers. Netscout claims Gartner’s Magic Quadrant harmed its enterprise sales and that the truth of Gartner’s statements […]

    Is this how the Quadrant lost its Magic?

    Is this how the Quadrant lost its Magic?

    Gartner’s Magic Quadrant is the most influential non-financial business research document. In the late 1980s, it was a quick and dirty stalking horse to provoke discussions. Today it is an extensive and yet highly limited process, based on the quantification of opinions which are highly qualitative. The early evolution of the MQ tells us a lot about the challenge of industry […]

There can never be an analyst influence database [Practitioner Question]

question-mark-graphic.jpgQuestion: Is there a database that ranks analysts in terms of influence?

While there are some fine analyst directories or databases available for purchase (e.g., ARinsight’s ARchitect3) none of have “influence” data. This is because influence is a relative term which is dependent on what the vendor is trying to accomplish and the market space they are addressing. Obviously two companies with different products would see the same analyst as having different influence.  However, two competitors in the same market could also end up with analyst lists that are different because they have different business objectives they are trying to accomplish. Even the same vendor could rank the influence of the same analysts differently over time, even in a span of only a few months, as the vendor’s business and analyst relations (AR) objectives change.

While there are no databases of influence to purchase, AR can still create a formal analyst list management process with documented ranking criteria. Although this framework cannot eliminate the work associated with determining influence, it will permit AR to rank their analyst lists efficiently.

If an AR team does not have the bandwidth to do the work associated with creating an analyst list, there are third party firms that have the skills, tools, and data to do this work. Readers are encouraged to contact SageCircle if you would like to discuss the options for this type of engagement.

SageCircle Technique:

  • Develop a formal analyst list management process that first ranks the analysts based on relevance then tiers the list based on AR’s resources
  • Revisit ranking criteria whenever the company’s or AR’s objectives change
  • Schedule regular reviews of analyst lists
  • Avoid the trap of assuming that the large analyst firms’ (e.g., Forrester, Gartner and IDC) analysts are automatically “Tier 1” because they are not highly influential in all markets

Bottom Line: There will never be a database of analyst influence available because influence is determined by the vendor’s business objectives at a particular point in time.

Question: AR – Do you have a formal analyst list management process? If yes, how often do you review and refresh your analyst lists?

Got questions on the analysts and AR? SageCircle has the answers. This practitioner question is an example of the type of client inquiries that SageCircle strategists handle daily. If you would like to understand how SageCircle Advisory services can increase your effectiveness and efficiency – and maybe reduce your stress – please contact us at “info [at] sagecircle [dot] com” or 503-636-1500.

4 Responses

  1. Hello Carter,

    the very same question has been asked by clients more frequently in my experience. I think this partly reflects increased budget pressures present with some vendors at the moment: There is less understanding for the need to do the necessary homework and really find out about the sales influence that individual analysts have for specific markets. These projects do cost some time, and this is why some vendors start to think of google-ing a list together. However, this is impossible. ..and – I agree: there will never be such a one-fits-all list.

    And there is one more reason why “a business model” around analyst influence rankings would not work: Every analyst has to agree that information describing his/her importantce – along with his/her name, is gathered and sold. At least European privacy laws make it very hard to gather and sell such information.
    My best regards,

  2. Hi Carter,

    Lighthouse’s online AR Intranet database does rank analyst firms and analysts, using part of the Analyst Impact Modelling methodology I’ve used since 2000.

    The points you raise are really issues of all rankings, rankings, Waves and Quadrant: the method they use might not correspond perfectly to an individual’s needs. However, the advantage of a third-party ranking is that is gives a starting point.

    No-one will be surprised to hear that custom rankings are still needed by our clients. That’s a notable part of any AR services business. However even simple quantitative rankings – like revenue from your client sector, number of analysts in your geography, or relative focus on your technology or service segment – are a powerful starting point for people who are time poor and perhaps need to rank analysts in emerging markets or new technology areas.


  3. Duncan, Thanks for the comment.

    How can you rank “influence” in a database without knowing what the AR and business criteria are?

    It is certainly possible to capture certain pieces of data useful for ranking an analyst list, e.g., your points about revenue and geography plus others like exposure. However, that data does not translate into a relvant “influence” rating until an AR team applies a decision framework based specifically on their situation.

  4. Hi Carter,

    I think there are two ways to address those: and we use both.

    The first is to use those criteria that meet the needs of most clients, which is to focus on analysts that are influencing sales. Again, we’re using the Analyst Impact Modelling approach which we’ve used for the best part of a decade and – while it’s not going to fit everyone – it meets the needs of our clients well.

    The second is to expose the base data to the user so they can develop their own weighting (or ask us to). Clients might need specific weightings for regions, technologies or market segments and they can filter our data accordingly – or add in their own variables.

    Of course, no ranking method will be perfect, but if it gives a useful starting point and helps people focus their effort then it’s a service worth providing.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: