• Recent Posts: Influencer Relations

    Why KCG’s analyst relations awards beat the IIAR’s

    Why KCG’s analyst relations awards beat the IIAR’s

    We used 18,777 data points from the Analyst Attitude Survey to compare the two leading awards for analyst relations teams. Although we found that KCG‘s awards are more useful than the IIAR‘s, both primarily reflect corporate performance rather than that of the AR teams. As a result, there’s very little that AR teams can do better or worse in these […]

    Netscout continues unwise Gartner suit

    Netscout continues unwise Gartner suit

    Netscout and Gartner have scheduled their trial for next July. The case stands little chance of improving Netscout’s value. It does, however, risk harming the reputation of both analyst firms and analyst relations professionals. Over the last weeks, pressure has mounted on Netscout’s lawyers. Netscout claims Gartner’s Magic Quadrant harmed its enterprise sales and that the truth of Gartner’s statements […]

    Is this how the Quadrant lost its Magic?

    Is this how the Quadrant lost its Magic?

    Gartner’s Magic Quadrant is the most influential non-financial business research document. In the late 1980s, it was a quick and dirty stalking horse to provoke discussions. Today it is an extensive and yet highly limited process, based on the quantification of opinions which are highly qualitative. The early evolution of the MQ tells us a lot about the challenge of industry […]

    Saying farewell to David Bradshaw

    Saying farewell to David Bradshaw

    A funeral and celebration for David Bradshaw (shown left in this 2000 Ovum awayday photo, arm raised, with me and other colleagues) is to take place at West Norwood Crematorium, London SE27 at 2.45pm on Tuesday 23rd August and after at the Amba Hotel above London’s Charing Cross Station, on the Strand. David considered that that Ovum in that incarnation was […]

    David Bradshaw 1953-2016

    David Bradshaw 1953-2016

    David Bradshaw, one of the colleagues I worked with during my time as an analyst at Ovum, died on August 11. He led Cloud research in Europe for IDC, whose statement is below. David played a unique role at Ovum, bridging its telecoms and IT groups in the late 1990s by looking at computer-telecoms integration areas like CRM, which I […]

AR teams will get in trouble with executives for being surprised by analysts’ social media commentary – Looking ahead to 2010

icon-crystal-ball.jpgThis post is one in a series where SageCircle pulls out the crystal ball and looks ahead to what happens in the analyst ecosystem in 2010. See below for links to all posts in this series.

The vast majority of analyst relations (AR) teams are not regularly monitoring their most relevant analysts’ social media usage. However, this lack of attention could prove to be politically dangerous in 2010.

Many AR professionals have been confronted by executives at their companies with negative press quotes by the analysts. Often the executives demand to know why the analyst made the negative comment and what AR is going to do about it. Up through the early Internet age, while troublesome because it caused a fire drill, it was reasonable for AR not to be aware of a particular quote because a comprehensive press clipping service would have been too expensive. However, as the Internet and search tools matured, it has because harder for AR to justify ignorance about press quotes. This provides the added danger of damaging AR’s credibility for not being on top of the situation.

As more analysts adopt social media, sometimes chaotically, AR now has to anticipate being confronted by an executive wanting to know about some analyst’s negative blog post, tweet, or comment made in a social network. Just as with press quotes today, AR cannot feign ignorance about the negative comments made in social media. This is because it is perceived to be free and “easy” to monitor social media. Thus, an AR team that is not aware of an analyst social media comment brought to its attention by an executive will be in grave danger of having its credibility questioned. This could give rise to a new group tasked with social media influencer relations that would take over working with key analysts.

SageCircle Technique:

  • AR needs to put into place a simple social media monitoring program for its most relevant analysts – in 2010 this would be a relatively small task for most AR teams
  • AR needs to incorporate analyst comments and opinions expressed on social media into regular reports to executive sponsors – this would demonstrate that AR is aware of and on top of analyst social media usage

Bottom Line: Social media monitoring is becoming a requirement for AR as both relevant analysts and internal stakeholders start adopting social media in greater numbers. Being a lagging adopter of social media could cause AR extreme politically problems in 2010.

Question: AR – Have you been surprised by a comment made by an analyst in social media? If yes, what were the ramifications?

Looking ahead to 2010 Series

13 Responses

  1. Agreed.

    Analysts can influence the market with blogs, forum comments, and event tweets.

    Yet, AR professionals should not focus on the ‘mediums’ of where an analysts’ domain is, but instead focus on the overall influence of the analyst –regardless of communication channels used.

    PDFs are just but one way they influence, think bigger, focus on the overall influence across multiple channels.

    • Hi Jeremiah, Thanks for the comment.

      Social media of all sorts will eventually be just items in the AR communications toolbox. Unfortunately, today too many AR teams are unaware of or ignoring the use of social media by relevant analysts. They are ones who are going to bear the brunt of this prediction.

      BTW, key word is “relevant.” AR only has to look at social media usage by the most relevant of their analysts.

  2. Great insight.

    The “better safe than sorry” approach is not the way to fully introduce or launch a product.

    AR plans have to be aligned with Marketing strategy (their was a big “M” there) and look to those who externally connect with and listen to the market for ways to eliminate the negative and bring real evidence that social media is valuable.

    In organizations where Marketing and Product Management exist, AR has to use these experts to fill the gaps in bringing the correct positoning, and message to the analysts.

  3. I suspect that social media is more dangerous to the analyst than the AR team.

    • Hi Barney, thx for the comment.

      I will have to respectfully disagree. As long as analysts do not say anything libelous, acts stupidly (e.g., using excess profanity or posting too many inane tweets, comments, etc), or give away too much content that inhibts sales, there is no real downside to using social media for analysts. It is not like there is a service that measure the quality or accuracy of the analyst commentary via social media.

      For AR, there are many dangers. For example, an analyst could use social media to spread rumors about a vendor or make a recommendation that prospects hold off signing a contract that could impact revenues, market perception and/or brand equity. If AR is not monitoring the relevant analysts’ social media commentary it could have a negative impact on the vendor and cause internal political issues.

  4. Agree with Jeremiah. One thing that I notice as an analyst is when AR’s message is disconnected from outbound marketing, outbound messaging, or public financial statements because they are so focused on specific product marketing. A good AR person can provide this holistic message and get honest feedback from an analyst that will pre-sage potential social media messages sent out.

    It’s not as if we, as analysts, create and support social media initiatives in a vacuum. We just have more direct and concentrated ways of sending out our perspective and recommendations to targeted audiences. Analysts will call out inconsistencies and, with the advent of social media as a communications channel, can do this publicly as soon as the perception is created based on the entirety of knowledge that we have.

  5. […] Comments Hyoun Park on AR teams will get in trouble w…Barney Finucane on AR teams will get in trouble w…sagecircle on AR teams will get in trouble […]

  6. […] Comments Gartner surprised by… on AR teams will get in trouble w…Hyoun Park on AR teams will get in trouble w…Barney Finucane on AR teams will get in trouble […]

  7. Via Twitter. Sanchit Vir Gogia of Springboard Research. @s_v_g

    @carterlusher nice post & I agree with AR teams facing the heat. But not all analysts are “as influential”, so got to follow the right ones!

    • Hi Sanchit. thx for comment.

      Completely agree about AR only following relevant analysts. Part of the problem is that identifying and ranking analysts is getting more complex all the time.

  8. […] AR teams will get in trouble with executives for being surprised by analysts’ social media comment… […]

  9. […] AR teams will get in trouble with executives for being surprised by analysts’ social media comment… […]

  10. […] AR teams will get in trouble with executives for being surprised by analysts’ social media comment… […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: