• Recent Posts: Kea's research blog

    ‘Influencer relations’ is no longer the best term for B2B relationship marketing

    ‘Influencer relations’ is no longer the best term for B2B relationship marketingWhen our blog changed its name from Analyst Equity to Influencer Relations, we did so to reflect the two-fold role that analyst relations established in integrating communications: enabling relationships with similar business-to-business (B2B) influencers, sourcing advisors and consultants; and developing messages and materials that enable internal capacities like sales, marketing insight and marketing. Many B2B Read more about ‘Influencer relations’ is no longer the best term for B2B relationship marketing[…]

    AR Classics: Identifying and Measuring Impact and Influence

    AR Classics: Identifying and Measuring Impact and InfluenceHow can analysts in non-traditional, freemium, analyst firms prove their value, and how should analyst relations professionals respond to their growing impact? Until analysts start to track their impact in the fullest way, they will always be underestimated by suppliers in the high technology and telecommunications industries. Back in 2015, when this was posted, Edelman’s Read more about AR Classics: Identifying and Measuring Impact and Influence[…]

    Investor relations head takes over AR at Tata

    Investor relations head takes over AR at TataThe IIAR is discussing a big surprise: one of the big 3 IT services brands just put its analyst relations (AR) under the control of its head of investor relations (IR). It would be unimaginable in most firms, and perhaps Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is one of the few firms that can do that well. Tata Sons’ Read more about Investor relations head takes over AR at Tata[…]

    Peter O’Neill joins Kea Company as Research Director

    Peter O’Neill joins Kea Company as Research DirectorLONDON. February 1st 2018 — Longtime industry analyst Peter O’Neill has been appointed Research Director by Kea Company, the world’s largest analyst relations (AR) consultancy. O’Neill was previous research director at Forrester Research, leading the firm’s services for analyst relations professionals as well as research for B2B Marketing professionals.   At Kea Company, O’Neill will Read more about Peter O’Neill joins Kea Company as Research Director[…]

    AR Classics: Barbara French on how to grab an Influential Analyst’s Attention

    AR Classics: Barbara French on how to grab an Influential Analyst’s AttentionBarbara French’s Grab an Influential Analyst’s Attention: 3 Secrets & 4 Tips helps companies to avoid some of the most common errors in analyst relations. We especially appreciated these points in the article. Marketers can use analysts and analyst research to add credibility to their businesses without ever having the analyst specifically endorse their company. Read more about AR Classics: Barbara French on how to grab an Influential Analyst’s Attention[…]
  • Advertisements

Forrester or Gartner launch a client-only social network – Looking ahead to 2010

Ticon-crystal-ball.jpghis post is one in a series where SageCircle pulls out the crystal ball and looks ahead to what happens in the analyst ecosystem in 2010. See below for links to all posts in this series.

As 2009 comes to a close there are only a few examples of analyst-created communities built on social networks. One example is the IDC Insights Community, which was launched in March 2009 and is built on a white-label social network platform. This is an open community that anybody, including competitors to IDC, can register to join. This is an interesting experiment by IDC as it potentially enhances IDC’s ability to increase its visibility with enterprise clients.

While 2010 will see more analyst-operated open communities built on free tools like LinkedIn Groups or purchased social networking platforms, the most interesting and controversial communities will be the “gated communities” that Forrester and/or Gartner might launch. These closed communities would only be available to clients of the firms.

Social media purists will no doubt howl that a closed social network violates the spirit of communities and that the firms are dumb for not using the communities a marketing tool to build awareness to non-clients. Perhaps these objections are valid, but there are valid reasons why closed, managed communities will actually be welcomed by enterprise end users.  Not everybody is comfortable with the rough-and-tumble attitude of some open communities. In some cases a limited number of participants – hiding behind anonymity – feel empowered to be rude, disruptive, and counterproductive.  Some enterprise managers will like communities focused specifically on their job responsibilities. Forrester and Gartner can easily facilitate this because they have already moved toward role-based research and self-identifications. Other enterprise managers will enjoy being part of an exclusive club. Yet another group of managers would resent that “freeloaders” who do not have contracts are getting free access to what they are spending tens of thousands of dollars, Euros, or yen to purchase.

Client-only programs are very popular at the big two advisory firm. For example, Gartner has around 3,500 members in its CIOs-only EXP service. If Gartner includes concierge service for the CIOs in the community, encourages analyst participation, and effectively promotes the community within its EXP membership, it could build a thriving CIO-centric community. This community would in turn become a valuable asset for selling EXP memberships.

What could be especially controversial for vendors is if the firms do not permit vendor staff to participate in the communities. There are examples, like EXP, where vendors are not allowed to sign up for the service simply because they are a vendor.

SageCircle Technique:

  • Competitors to Forrester and Gartner will need to monitor any closed communities to determine if this is an approach that may be emulated or countered with open communities
  • Enterprise clients and prospects of Forrester and Gartner should carefully weigh the benefits of joining a closed community, especially if part of a premium priced service (e.g., Gartner for IT Leaders)
  • Vendor AR teams will need include more budget funding for access of at least one seat to any closed communities in order to learn about how they are being adopted by end users – assuming the firms permit vendors to join the communities.

Bottom Line: Communities can be very powerful for analyst firms, but it is still too early to know what the right approach is going to be. 2010 will be a time of experimentation with closed communities being one of the models tried.

Question: Enterprise clients of Forrester and Gartner – Would a firm-owned private network make you more likely or less likely to participate in a community?

Looking ahead to 2010 Series

Advertisements

6 Responses

  1. Hey Carter, Forrester already has a client only social network — currently accessible to FLB members only. It launched shortly before I left the company and, coincidentally enough, Jive is the technology provider.

  2. […] Forrester or Gartner launch a client-only social network […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: